|
Natural draught cooling towers are normally designed as concrete shells for wet cooling, that is, the water flows down inside the tower and is cooled by the ascending air. These towers consume large quantities of water and the escaping vapor may condense as ice in winter, thereby endangering the traffic in the vicinity of the tower. As a consequence, modern cooling towers are designed as dry towers, with the water running through pipes. In these towers the heat-exchange is by radiation, hence they are larger than towers designed for wet cooling. As the size of concrete towers cannot be increased arbitrarily due to stability problems, J. Schlaich (former partner of Leonhardt, Andrä and Partners) developed cable-net cooling towers, which with increasing size, become more economic than concrete towers. The main structural elements of this new type of cooling tower are:
- The center concrete mast, which may also be used as a chimney.
- The upper compression ring with suspension cables fixed to the mast and stiffened by locked coil ropes.
- The intermediate tension rings.
- The three-directional net of aluminum-covered strands.
- The 1-mm thin aluminum skin cladding fixed to the net.
Cable-net cooling towers can easily be built with heights up to 300 meters and to contain nuclear power plants. In this way, the plants are protected from impacting aircraft. Development of the structural system. Preliminary and final design of the first cable-net cooling tower at Schmehausen. References: Schlaich, J. and Mayr, G.: “Naturzug Kühlturm mit vorgespanntem Membranmantel (Natural Draught Cooling Tower with Prestressed Membrane Skin),” Der Bauingenieur 49 (1974), pp 41-45. “Suspended Net of Cables Forms Nuclear Plant’s Cooling Tower,” Engineering News Record, October 30, 1975, pp 16-17. Schlaich, J. and Mayr, G.: “Membrane Skin and Cable-Net Cooling Towers,” Preliminary Report IABSE 10th Congress, Tokyo, 1976, pp 33-38. Schlaich, J., Mayr, G., Weber, P. and Jasch, E.: “Der Seilnetzkühlturm Schmehausen (The Cable-Net Cooling Tower at Schmehausen),” Bauingenieur 51 (1976), pp 401-412. |
|